In a game where legacy and spectacle collide, boxing promoters are facing the dual challenge of captivating old fans while attracting new ones. Recently, Turki Alalshikh announced plans for an ambitious undercard featuring rising star Jared Anderson against veteran fighter Jarrell ‘Big Baby’ Miller during the highly anticipated Canelo Alvarez vs. Terence Crawford showdown set for September 13th on Netflix. While the prospect of this matchup may sound enticing to some, one must question the logic behind pairing a young contender with a fighter whose reputation has been tarnished by repeated scandals. The question looms: is boxing able to pivot into a future rich with promise, or is it trapped in a nostalgia cycle that may no longer resonate with sports enthusiasts?
A highlight of this venture is the promised four-fight main card, alongside a prelim featuring six to ten bouts scheduled to be available for free viewing—a strategy intended to foster fan engagement while providing exposure to budding prospects. In theory, this broad accessibility could democratize boxing by bringing the sport into the households of a new generation. However, one has to wonder if the inclusion of Miller, who has not secured a win in two years and carries a controversial history with performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs), will truly galvanize enough interest to make this card a success.
The Controversial Figure of Jarrell ‘Big Baby’ Miller
It’s hard to ignore Miller’s turbulent journey. The 36-year-old has not only failed to deliver in the ring but has also been embroiled in multiple PED-related scandals, casting a long shadow over his previous accomplishments. Pairing someone like Anderson, a promising fighter with a clean slate, against a boxer marked by scandals sends mixed messages to fans. Instead of elevating Anderson’s status by showcasing him against a noteworthy competitor, this matchup risks doubting his potential by association. One might argue that turkeys should be sent to the proverbial slaughterhouse, not lauded for past achievements, and Miller’s invitation back to the main stage feels more like a despondent acceptance of mediocrity than a celebration of the sport.
To provide a more stimulating challenge for Anderson, Alalshikh could consider notable alternatives like Agit Kabayel or Richard Torrez Jr. Both are fighters who do not carry the baggage that Miller does and could contribute to a more competitive, entertaining fight. Such matchups would establish Anderson as a formidable contender while adhering to the integrity of boxing as a sport.
The Bigger Picture: Future of Boxing in the Streaming Era
Alalshikh’s venture into Netflix—referred to as the “Riyadh Season” event—is an interesting innovation in a sport that has long relied on traditional television platforms. This represents an opportunity for boxing to adapt and cater to the streaming generation, potentially attracting a younger audience who consume media differently. However, the integrity of the matchups is further scrutinized under this spotlight. Can eclectic promotions keep audiences glued to their screens, or will questionable bouts drive them away?
Canelo vs. Crawford undoubtedly boasts the star power to elevate the event, but the undercard’s credibility comes down to the authenticity of its participants. In an age where boxing is vying for a greater market share against mixed martial arts and other combat sports, prioritizing compelling storytelling through well-matched fighters is essential. The landscape may shift rapidly, and handpicking bouts that inspire faith in up-and-coming talent can make or break viewing figures; thus, the choice of fighter matters more than ever.
A Clear Call to Action for Boxing Promoters
Turki Alalshikh claims, “From the beginning, I work from the side of fans,” outlining the ambition to cater to the audience’s desires. While that sentiment is commendable, there is an immediate need for action that aligns with this vision. Boxing not only thrives on rivalries and drama but on respect for the athletes who contribute to it. Promoters must realize the potential backlash of diluting the sport’s integrity for the sake of quick financial gain or nostalgic relevance. True innovation will not come from recycling stale storylines but from infusing the sport with fearless, competitive spirits eager to take center stage.
As the hype around this fight card builds, the conversation should extend beyond who will fight—to how the future of boxing can be positioned as a forward-thinking spectacle, one that champions athletes with hopeful prospects instead of compounding the past failures of others. The boxing community deserves invigorating bouts that could define the next generation of stars without being bogged down by the ghosts of past controversies.
Leave a Reply